Figure 1. The average seasonal and local time variations in ln(N/N0), at Argentine Islands (650 S) for 1971-1981, taken from Rodger et al. (1989).
![]() |
Figure 2. The equatorial extent of the “composition bulge” at 1200 UT, for equivalent storms in the northern hemisphere for a) summer, b) winter, and c) equinox conditions.
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 3a. Numerical simulation of a period during November and December of 1997 for the winter hemisphere. The top panel shows a comparison of the observed f0F2 and the monthly median. The middle panel is a comparison between the observed and CTIM modeled ratio of storm to quiet foF2 values. The lower panel shows the variations in the geomagnetic index ap.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 3b. Same as Figure 3a except for summer hemisphere.
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 4. Time history of the ap index over a five day interval from June 5th 1981, and the evolution of the ionosphere at mid-latitude over South America.
![]() |
Figure 5. Filter shape, F(t), representing the relationship between the geomagnetic index ap and the ionospheric storm-time response at summer mid-latitudes.

Figure 6. The seasonal/latitude response of the storm-to-quiet foF2 as a function of filtered ap, X(t0).
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 7. Observed and empirical model FoF2 ratios for the event that occurred on November 22/23 at two sites, Rome in the northern hemisphere (winter) and Grahamstown in the southern hemisphere (summer).

Figure 8. Illustration of the local time dependence in the residual of the foF2 storm-to-quiet ratio.